Her Mir Tage

9.5

The 1990 Richebourg was bursting with aromas just half an hour after opening—violet, wild cherry, dried rose, and sandalwood. The tannins were silky, yet the structure remained intact. An excellent bottle.

The 2002 Richebourg, after four hours of decanting, revealed stunningly delicate notes of face powder—extremely fine.

The 2005 RSV (Romanée-Saint-Vivant) showed creamy aromas right after opening, followed by the classic, captivating powdery perfume typical of a warm vintage. However, compared to the one from Méo-Camuzet, the DRC's powdery note carried a more grand and graceful presence. — 18 days ago

Conrad Green

9.1

Very light and crisp. Cherry and bright ness. Delicate — 2 months ago

with Walker and David

Alvaro Bustillos

9.5

Ypo mex ballesteros — 4 months ago

romo

9.3

Opens savory then turns sweet over an hour. Day 2 magic with more savory. Nepalese spice. — 5 months ago

Mike Matsumoto

9.2

いずこ供出の2022年もの。やっぱりすごい。 — 6 months ago

Lee Pitofsky

9.3

Initially quite reduced and aromatically closed but eventually opens up to reveal its Vosne perfume. The palate is impeccable though, with excellent density and richness, succulent fruit and acids and a long saline-mineral finish. — 7 months ago

Alvaro Bustillos

9.6

Anthiny zang sean coerteze — 8 months ago

Alvaro Bustillos

9.6

Cena lider mty @ gand cru — 4 days ago

Alvaro Bustillos

9.8

Grad tommy — a month ago

Alvaro Bustillos

9.6

Cata winegeeks cdjr @ardeo

4to lugar — 2 months ago

Marta Jackowska

9.5

Checking out a new wine spot….so had to be Vosne Romanee (for benchmarking purposes 😉).
Selected a great producer and vintage but not Grand Cru/Premier Cru, so interesting to see the difference 🤔
Earthy, leathering, not quite as refined and smooth as the Grand Crus but we are really being picky…still a great bottle of wine…and new venue (we will be back)! — 4 months ago

with Neville

Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

9.4

2010 vintage. 4th of 4 bottles. Last officially tasted 2.22.25 (9.4) but tasted two other bottles since...about 6 and 8 months ago. All three visits decanted, medium body, showing more fruit than expected and rated 9.4. This last bottle not decanted and tasted with @romo after approx 30 minutes open and again after 1.5 hours open. Light-medium/medium body. Most advanced of the four experiences and the least amount of fruit. Allowed for the delicate, finishing latticework to develop without distractions. Another 3-4 years in this current state before detouring elsewhere seems about right. 01.16.26. — 5 months ago

Pinotman /// Andreas

9.1

I think we need to get some life and excitement to this app! Here we go. No idea when and where I bought this. Cork perfect. No seep at all. 13%. Tons of tannins - I mean it. Has another 5 years or so but not more at this stage as the fruit will go down. And after that this wine will go into ??!!! Seems highly extracted and dense. Crushed marble, more dark than red fruit. A little to extracted for me - still rustic. A big wine. In fact huge. Blackberry, leather, hint violet, cedar, violets, lime, 🍋‍🟩 . Dry Red Port wine, plums. a benchmark wine i thought initially. My wife hated it. I am not convinced in the end the wife might be right!!!!!!! Happy wife happy life. — 7 months ago

Alexandre Pagliano

9.2

Oh so good, and consistent with prior bottles. Subtle, elegant, complex. — a month ago

with Jose, veronique and 1 other

Mark S.

9.4

Deep ruby red. Concentrated. Complexity. Still blueberry etc. fruitiness. Dried herb.
Fruitiness M+ Sweetness M Acidity M Tannin M Smooth Soft Silky Velvety. Bitterness M Body M+ Finish M++ Emmanuel ROUGET Vosne-Romante 10 @, fruit, 260502 — 2 months ago

Eric Vishria

9.5

Infanticide I know. Decanted for 30 min to start. Had after the 2014 Grivot Ech so really different. Much rounder and fruitier than I expected, but thoroughly enjoyed and will have to try another one in 5-8 years! — 4 months ago

Gilbert Van Hassel

9.7

Outstanding — 4 months ago

Michael Dierberg

9.6

Very elegant, floral. — 5 months ago

Lee Pitofsky

9.4

By now everyone knows the name of Charles Lachaux, quickly becoming a Burgundy legend, and while 2017 is the vintage where Charles’ stylistic changes are known to take full effect, by 2013 such changes had already begun once he took the reigns the prior year—more judicial use of new oak, increasing amounts of whole clusters each subsequent vintage, higher and denser canopies, just to mention a few. His 2019 vintage is what did it for me. Simply incredible wines.

But at age 12, 2013 Chaumes, 50% whole cluster and 50% new oak is showing beautifully after some required air, with a seductively elegant perfume, terrific fruit density and concentration for the vintage, and a long mineral, spice and saline inflicted finale. Pre-2017, I think the Vosne bottlings are the best, but I think they need at least 10 years to absorb the oak. But now, everything’s great, even on release! — 6 months ago

Conrad Green

9.7

Soft and haunting cherry fruit. Dried rose and orange rind, serious and pretty fruit. Gorgeous stuff. — 8 months ago

with Matt